Source Question on Public Health Reform 1832-1853 Essay

Source Question on Public Health Reform 1832-1853 Essay

Resources B and C largely provide similar evidence for attitudes towards Public Health and the dangers of an outbreak of disease in 1849 mainly because they both equally agree that public health in a few areas were much more serious than those which were affected by the newest Public Health Take action. This is crystal clear because Source B refers to, “We stay in muck and filthe” and Source C refers to, “We also want sewers and an ample supply of water”. They also both agree that we now have dangers of a great outbreak of disease in 1849 to get Source B refers to, “if the Cholera comes god help us” and in Resource C, the author claims that, “without which no efficient sanitary measures can be transported out”, which can be referring to the anxiety of disease. Equally Sources W and C offer identical evidence because they are both drafted for the same trigger. Sources N and C were both written by people that wanted the general public Health Act to affect their group due to the poor conditions and danger of disease within their areas. Also, they are both written at very similar dates, Source B he was written in 1848 and Source C having been written in 1849. This is important because public health at this time was considered to be dreadful and both give a good understanding towards the perils of an break out of disease in 1849. They also have the same goal, for they were written intended for the goal of having the population Health Action applied to their local areas (both fixed by other locals who have wanted the Act enforced), meaning that similar evidence would be involved in searching for the act. These types of similarities produce Source C more beneficial as proof for behaviour towards Public Health and the perils of an break out of disease in 1849 because the petition in Resource C was signed by simply 164 people, whereas Origin B was signed simply by 54 people. However , there are a few differences between Sources N and C as evidence for attitudes towards Public Health and the perils of an break out of disease in 1849. Firstly, equally sources present different evidence, for Resource B offers a greater perception of paralyzing desparation and dread, whereas Source C does not give because a sense of desolation. This can be noticed when Supply B refers to, “livin within a wilderness so far as the rest of London is aware anything of us” although Source C only states that, “Unlike elsewhere there appears to be a very favourable feeling towards to its (the Public Health Act) adoption”. The sources can also be written incredibly differently. Resource B is usually written with many spelling mistakes and negative grammar, while Source C is drafted in a more formal tone without any spelling blunders or negative grammar Exactly why the sources offer several evidence is because they are written by two people coming from very different qualification. Source M is written by someone who has clearly not been educated well as the letter is definitely written in poor The english language. This makes the source more useful as data for the attitudes to Public Health plus the dangers of an outbreak of disease in 1849 as it comes from someone who sounds even more desperate. Although, Source C is written by an active community Poor Law Guardian a middle category man or perhaps above, and has been knowledgeable. Due to the tone being formal, desperation to get the Public Overall health Act does not come through while clearly because Source W therefore it is less valuable data for the attitudes towards Public Health plus the dangers of an outbreak of disease in 1849. Resource B gives more beneficial evidence the origin C because not only does this describe circumstances of the public health problems and bring through the anxiety of the outbreak of disease in 1849, yet also presents more of a perception of paralyzing desparation due to the illiteracy of the writer, for example , “The stenche with their gully pit is disgustin We all people suffer and numbers are ill”. Supply B is usually reliable since it comes from someone who is clearly more in need of better public well-being conditions as a result of tone. Source C is just as reliable for the ‘Board’ was secured and he was helped by Chadwick’s favoured engineer. Overall, Source B much more useful than Source C as proof for behaviour towards Public Health and the dangers of an break out of disease in 1849 because it explains the public health problems of his area in greater fine detail than Resource C, and, his evidence is common to the conditions described at that time. However , with each other, they provide beneficial evidence because both corroborate that public welfare at the time was appalling and this there were dangers of an outbreak of disease in 1849.

Related Essays