Compare the beginning of the novel and Sinise’s film version “Of Mice and Men” Essay

Compare the beginning of the novel and Sinise’s film version  “Of Mice and Men” Essay

The opening of the novel as well as the film differ from each other in several ways. The film has a anxious and remarkable start where as the book is set within a quiet and peaceful forest area as Steinbeck units the scene in clear detail. The film starts with a haunting, chilling tune lingering in the back of a dark-colored screen with white credit appearing for a few minutes. Sinise places the credit at the beginning rather than at the end so that he adds to the drama in the beginning and doesn’t ruin the ending with them. Because the music dies out the dark-colored background is still with the irregular, faint column of moonlight, streaming throughout the open fractures in the truck of a teach. The camera shot concentrates on a unhappy figure, crouched in the corner, looking by expression in the face like he gets the weight on the planet on his shoulder muscles, as the frequent coach whistles drown out his thoughts. This makes the audience curious about who the man is, making them want to watch to find out the identity of the mysterious character. Suddenly the film explodes into colour in a remarkable style as being a panic-stricken woman, with her dress ripped, runs towards a group of males working on a ranch. The next clip is of the band of men, transporting guns upon horseback, all laden in denim chasing after two apparently un-armed males. These two guys are Lennie and George, who happen to be racing throughout the grassy bushes of the plains. A sense of hazard and menace is created as George can be continually checking out his glenohumeral joint and transferring Lennie along as the men on horseback continue to search the two guys. We afterwards realise that the is emblematic of the two men’s marriage, as George always has to look over his shoulder in real life. That symbolises a mother constantly looking over her shoulder to see if her baby is all proper. Both of the men fall into a stream and hide beneath the overgrown reeds and turf from the alpage. The men pass by the stream and this causes a sense of enjoyment and stress within the audience. The 1st close up on Lennie reveals us his big, anxious eyes, anxious like a kid, with his dilated pupils reflecting the sunlight. The heavy deep breathing stops but both males remain noiseless, and as time goes by the crickets begin to chirp plus the audience get yourself a chance to get their breathing back. After that it goes back into a train noise and by now night has fallen. Both equally men hop onto a train, Lennie goes initially and is hoisted up by George; this is symbolic of a mother picking up her kid after it includes fallen straight down, or can be struggling to get up. Lennie tells George that he could be tired, so George explains to him to lie down and go to sleep. Lennie’s jacket is definitely wet and so George helps him to consider it away. This action can be symbolic of the mother/child romantic relationship that the two men have. George takes Lennie’s jacket away like a mom undressing a young child. The beginning of the novel is incredibly different while Steinbeck models the landscape in obvious detail. This individual creates a very quiet and peaceful atmosphere by using phrases such as “fresh and green with every spring” and “the leaves rest so profound and so crisp that a lizard makes a wonderful skittering in the event he operates among them”. Unlike this, the film shows an exciting chase in a tense and dangerous atmosphere. The first time the truth is Lennie and George in the novel they can be calmly jogging through the trees and quietly drinking from your pool. “His huge companion dropped his blankets and flung himself down when he drank from the surface from the green pool”. This is another symbol of Lennie acting like a child. On the other hand when we first discover Lennie and George inside the film they can be running faraway from a company of widespread ranchers, seething for their blood vessels. In the film they are both putting on different clothing. George is wearing denim and Lennie has on dungarees to create him resemble a ‘big kid’. This is different from the story as Steinbeck has the two men in identical gown. “Both had been dressed in jeans trousers and in denim coats with brass buttons. ” Also “they both wore black shapeless hats”. The finish of the story is also very different to the end of the film. At the end of the novel Lennie hides inside the bush wherever George stated it was secure. While he waits this individual hallucinates and sees a significant rabbit show up and talks to him, telling him that this individual has done incorrect and has let George down for all those that this individual has done pertaining to him. Then simply his Cousin Clara appears and begins scolding him for his behaviour. This does not happen in the film because the audience may well loose attention and it takes the edge from the seriousness with the atmosphere, that Sinise attempts to create. At the end of the film George is seeking Lennie, trying to reach him before the furious mob carry out and shateringly kill him. George operates to find Lennie, running since at the beginning of the film, but this time running on his own, running and falling, which can be symbolic of his prediciment with Lennie. George finally finds Lennie wandering at a cut by the stream. Lennie works to George and falls over in water by George’s feet. Lennie persists to cuddle George like a kid cuddling its mother. There is a long concentrated camera shot of George and Lennie in the water. This is the very first time we see George taller than Lennie and this is emblematic of the parent/child relationship they have with each other. The camera concentrates on them for several seconds to emphasise this element of their romantic relationship and to show how close the two guys are. Inside the novel both men aren't in the water when they hug and there is not any indication that George is bigger than Lennie. They are both on the banking institutions near to the water. Sinise simply adds this kind of part into the film for making it look as if Lennie has just gone down over emphasising his confusion. In the story Lennie asks George to share with him the story of ‘how it is going to be’, along with several efforts George shoots him inside the head helping him pass away painlessly and with a specific amount of pride. At the sound of the shot the men appear and encompass George. They presume there has been challenging and George has shot Lennie in self-defence, only Slim realises what has really happened. Though George can be left all alone there is the likelihood that Slender and he will probably develop a better friendship. A large number of changes were created from this unique ending inside the film edition. When George was sharing with Lennie the story of ‘how it was likely to be’ this individual shoots him first time following Lennie says “and We get to tend the rabbits”. Lennie, who was crouched in the knees, is curled up like a baby or an embryo with George position over him after he previously been shot. Once again this can be symbolic of the mother child relationship between them and also symbolises Lennie getting like a kid. The final camera shot to them both grows on a huge shot in the pool wherever George advised Lennie it absolutely was supposed to be secure. The audience visualises the trust Lennie got in George and this is emphasised through this scene. The next shot extends back to the starting where it can be George who was on the train sitting in around the corner lonely and isolated. He has a flashback and remembers the good instances that this individual and Lennie had. With this flashback they will both walk side by side, cheerful and having a laugh, Lennie places his provide around George like a child wanting devotion from his mother. This kind of caption is within slow motion to make the audience remember how good the friendship was between the two and to make the audience feel sorry for the depressed George. It then goes noiseless, the picture ends to a dark-colored screen and it ends. Another major difference between the story and the film is the way in which Curley’s better half is portrayed. In the new she is pictured as a flirtatious tart, where as in the film she is portrayed as very and only softly flirts. In the novel she actually is seen as like a tart. ” She had full, rouged lips and wide-spaced eye, heavily constructed. Her fingernails were red. Her hair hung in little folded clusters, just like sausages. The lady wore a cotton home dress and red mules, on the insteps of which were little arrangements of reddish ostrich feathers. ” This kind of extract obviously shows that she's unsuitably attired for her natural environment. She put on backless shoes and boots (mules) with ostrich down on the instep, with a red dress. This was not the clothing you would expect to become worn on a ranch. The girl only dresses this way so the men look closely at her because she is bitterly lonely. In the film Curley’s wife is viewed as very different to the as this wounderful woman has a very pretty face and is only slightly flirtatious, whereas in the novel your woman blatantly flirts with Lennie. When the girl asked Lennie what experienced happened to Curley’s hands, Lennie instantly looks at Sweets for help and without having reply, he turns his gaze downwards towards his lap. This kind of shows you a aspect of Lennie that is aiming to reach out to get help such as a young child. Seeking guidance he vaguely responses, “Curley received his hands caught within a machine”. Curley’s wife jeered “Ok equipment. I’ll speak to you afterwards. I like machines. ” The girl picks out Lennie as he is the weakest and probably the most likely to fall for her appeal due to his mental immaturity. Again the lady persists to flirt with Lennie when the four happen to be talking about George. Lennie says “That’s the guy, and he’s going to let me tend the rabbits”, to which Curley’s wife provides “Well in the event that that’s all you need, I might get yourself a couple rabbits myself. ” She comes across as incredibly manipulative through this part of the story. In the film, she appears very unhappy, and director Sinise provides a scene, which is not in the novel. Through this scene Curley’s wife tells George and Lennie of how Curley pennyless all of her records, that happen to be her only company. This makes the audience feel sorry for her, because she is very lonely as if she has lost all of her friends. Inside the novel the reader sees Curley’s wife as being lonely, nonetheless they do not feel sorry for her since she has an extremely nasty characteristics. An example of this is when she is in Crook’s area and regularly calls the men “bindle stiffs” and “bindle bums”. She says, “they left all the poor ones here”. She repeats this vicious nature when ever saying, “Standin here talking to a bunch of bindle stiffs – a nigger an’ a dum-dum an’ a bad ol’ lamb – an’ likin’ it because that they ain’t nobody else”. Criminals tells her to get free from his space and your woman bombards him with a bad racial strike saying, “Listen Nigger. I could get you strung up on a tree very easy it ain’t even funny. ” This kind of inner character is only released when the girl with most depressed, as the girl believes that Curley simply cannot satisfy her emotionally or physically, within a marriage she's in to avoid a spin out of control of her self-loneliness. This results in her need to lust for the other males on the farm, as this might be her just chance to obtain the happiness your woman secretly desires for. This kind of tone that she speaks to people in is not impacted by many areas of the film as the director attempts to make the viewers feel sorry on her behalf, whilst in the novel you are made to feel that she well deserved to be wiped out due to the approach she threatened Crooks. I believe Sinise would this to help you feel sorry on her when the lady dies and bring George’s killing of Lennie right into a deeper possible. The age of Curley’s wife also differs in both the novel and the film. In the new Curley’s better half is merely the tender regarding fifteen/sixteen, even though in the film she is portrayed as a very much older plus more mature era. My personal favourite between the novel and the film, is the book as it is an amazing and stimulating read. I believe that the film version is very emotional, plus the director Sinise portrays the novel in different ways, although the details and explanation of the film can never compare with the original new. You will find that typically the film cannot reproduce the same empathy and thoughts used when the author initially creates their masterpiece.

Related Essays