Nursing Research Critique Assignment Essay

Nursing Research Critique Assignment Essay

I will be critiquing two different content articles. Both studies are nursing studies that evaluate final results. I will be subsequent specific key points for a quantitative perspective and a qualitative perspective. There is also a guideline that I will be next for each content that includes discovering and evaluating the data collection and data analysis strategies used in every single study. The names of the content articles are The Connection with Patients Starting Awake Craniotomy and The Associated with Crossed Lower leg Blood Pressure Dimension. The recommendations will also be reviewed to determine validity and romance to the new study. Info Collection Quantitative Study: The operational and conceptual classification is congruent. The key parameters were operationalized using the best possible method and with sufficient justification. Certain instruments had been adequately described and had been good choices, given the study purpose, the variables being researched, and the research population. The instrument employed specifically was obviously a blood pressure keep an eye on. The blood pressure cuff size, dimensions, and inflation pressure were defined. The blood pressure monitor was adequately pretested and calibrated before the research began with a biomedical specialist (Foster-Fitzpatrick, Ortiz, Sibilano, Omone, & Braun, 1999). It might be determined the fact that data collection methods supplied data that was reliable and valid. The input executed was having sufferers cross their very own legs and measuring their particular blood pressure. The intervention was adequately referred to and integrated. The execution of the involvement was dedicated to the plan (Polit & Beck, 2012). The info was gathered by qualified nurse research workers (Foster-Fitzpatrick ainsi que al., 1999). The same stress monitor was operated throughout the data collection to minimize biases (Foster-Fitzpatrick ou al., 1999). Qualitative Research: The methods pertaining to gathering data were appropriate and the info was obtained using interviews over a period of 2 days (Palese, Skrap, Fachin, Visioli, & Zannini, 2008). It could be determined that triangulation was achieved because the interviews had been performed upon numerous occasions and during assorted circumstances. The researchers did ask the proper questions and make the correct observations, that have been also registered in an appropriate fashion. It is usually concluded that sufficient data was gathered, provided the facts required to be a factor in this study. The information collected was adequately rich in depth and detail. The data was accumulated using selection interviews with open-ended questions. The interviews were audio-recorded. The info compilation tools were valid and dependable for this study. Data collection was adequately described and appeared suitable for this type of research. Bias was kept down. The research workers were to decide and acknowledge ideas which may have caused or triggered personal biases, they also were required to recognize any personal activities or morals that might have influenced the actual were gonna hear and report (Palese et al., 2008). Info Analysis Quantitative Study: Analyses were appropriated to answer the study question also to test the hypothesis. The researchers performed various parts on a sample of hypertensive males to ascertain if the traversing of a calf has an effect on blood pressure measurements. Appropriate record methods had been used presented the level of way of measuring and presumptions of the check. However , there was clearly only one certain group that was the varying, 100 hypertensive males in whose ages went from 31 to 81. Speculation testing enables researchers to make objective decisions whether analyze results most likely reflect probability sample differences or accurate population distinctions (Polit & Beck, 2012). In this study there was not any control group. Then, how can we identify that traversing your lower leg would increase blood pressure. It is challenging to back up whether a type I and type 2 errors had been actually minimized or prevented. The treatment studies would not perform an intention-to-treat analysis. All of the participants were cared for and there was clearly no disregarded information. The participants as well did not get away from the study. The difficulties of absent values were evaluated and adequately resolved. The constraint of the research includes male or female and sample size. The researchers reviewed the weaknesses with solutions for foreseeable future studies. The researchers suggest replicating this kind of study using a larger test size that includes females. That they consider the particular changes would increase the significance of the outcomes. The studies are talked about and interpreted. Information about statistical significance and confidence span is presented and reviewed. There was good use of tables and numbers that included titles and headings that have been clearly and appropriately branded. The outcome was also clearly displayed in tables with identifiable game titles and tagged headings. The study included descriptive statistics. The analysis described the primary characteristics inside the dataset. The mean and standard deviation for each stress measurement was calculated before and after crossing from the legs was performed by the study themes. Inferential statistics were also within this research. In order to test mean variations with three or more groupings, an examination of difference (ANOVA) record test is used. This study conducted a repeated-measure ANOVA, which is when there are three or more actions of the same centered variable for every participant (Polit & Beck, 2012). Testing blood pressure for various intervals and beneath numerous conditions for the same subject matter is a single incident in which this type of tests can be used.. The model for this design was repeated actions analysis of variance (ANOVA). The level of value in this analyze was explained at < 0. 05 for any three effects in the style, (before traversing the legs, during hip and legs crossed, after having crossed the legs). This relevance level shows that research workers accept a risk that out of 100 selections drawn from a population, a true null hypothesis would be rejected 5 times (Polit & Beck, 2012). Presented the level of dimension and the character of the hypothesis, the results were adequate. However , I believe that further research is required to have got a more robust correlation. A wider sample population should be used in long term research to acquire more accurate findings. Qualitative Analyze: The data management and data analysis strategies were sufficiently described. The data analysis strategy was suitable for the research traditions. It was likewise compatible with the type and type of data collected. The findings are successfully summarized. There was good utilization of citations from your patient interviews. The researchers were able to summary concepts which were found in the information collected in the interviews. Even though each individual had a unique experience, the researchers could actually categorize principles from the info that was analyzed. Research workers were able to group these principles into pre-operative concerns, intra-operative concerns, and post-operative issues. Since there is limited study conducted in intra-operative activities there were limitations with the potential of being capable to link that to recently performed research. However , the study did identify the limits completely. Since this can be described as qualitative study, generally these types of studies may not be generalized for the population. Qualitative researchers are generally not concerned with the typical population, but rather with subjects experiences (Polit & Beck, 2012). The researchers do acknowledge the importance of the health care team members to consider patient’s encounters in order to better understand how to prioritize the requirements of the sufferer (Palese ain al., 2008). I believe that biases were kept into a minimal with the implementations which the researchers had been exposed to at the outset of the study and before these were exposed to the interviews or observations. The composition and exploration of the data produced genuine and significant descriptions with the experiences that the patients whom were topics had. Synopsis After reviewing both articles and critiquing each one particular, I believe to get a better understanding about the difference between a quantitative research study and a qualitative research study. Data collection should be organized and careful. Both research gathered their data methodically and meticulously. In view of the statistical analysis, levels of way of measuring should be thought as nominal, ordinal, interval or ratio level data. Options for data can be documentary options as principal and second sources, field sources while subjects in person, conditions, environment and events that are visible and considerable, and historic data. Both these styles the studies also experienced these types of options. The methods of collecting info include studies questioning applying interview schedule and questionnaires, observation approaches with the help of methodized or unstructured instruments, and measuring with standardized devices. Both of the studies as well used many of these methods for collecting data. The objective of analyzing info in a examine is to identify the data in meaningful terms. For example , the analysis in reference to stress changes used tables to get interpretation. Statistics help to response important study questions in fact it is the answers to this sort of questions that further the understandings. It can be required the researcher with an understanding of what tools fit a particular research study. Depending on the kinds of variables recognized (nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio) as well as the design of particular study, number of statistical tactics is available to investigate data. The information collection and data research methodologies applied varied and followed this need of each and every research study. The researchers implemented the research procedure guidelines and methodologies. Even though, both studies had a lot of weaknesses, these people were both performed adequately, using appropriate tactics and instruments. They were likewise both performed with honesty, discussing all their limitations and weaknesses.

Related Essays