Relativistic Theory of Ethics Essay

Relativistic Theory of Ethics Essay

A single relativistic theory of ethics is situationism. Situationism (also known as circumstance ethics) was devised simply by Joseph Fletcher, who was highly against tyrann theories for example; legalism and also disliked just how religions had been taught implying there were a few rules that may never end up being broken, when he thought these kinds of rules are too demanding and restrictive. Then he created this kind of theory of situation ethics which is viewed as the ‘mid way’ because it lies between antinomianism and legalism. Antinomianism is very anti law although legalism emphasises the important of law. However , situationism lies between the two as Fletcher was extremely enthused by causing a decision in individual circumstances. Situation integrity maintains that it’s the effects of actions which determine whether a task is right or perhaps wrong, it is therefore very much a consequentialist placement. Situationists enter into each decision making situation with ethical maxims of their community and tradition, each they treat with respect. Fletcher proposed not only the circumstance guides a person on the actual should do although also the principle of agape (love). In Fletcher’s book he suggests that Christians should associated with right selections without blindly following guidelines but rather simply by thinking for themselves. Decisions needs to be made within the sole basis of one guideline – fervor. Such appreciate involves doing the best thing easy for the other party involved. Thus maxims could be ignored if perhaps they don’t serve ardency, for example if a priest can be presented by a young lady who is having underage promiscuous love-making, the right action to take would be to persist the dude uses contraceptive. This is because the most loving thing to do for each other is to make sure she is secure. For the situationist the rule of agape is actually right. Fletcher created some working rules which layed out how circumstance ethics works. The first one is definitely pragmatism, which will states that what you recommend must work in practice. Second is relativism, so Fletcher eliminates words like ‘always’, ‘never’, and ‘absolute’. This individual states there are no goal rules but all decisions must be relative to agape. Finally is positivism, which says a value judgement needs to be built, giving the first place to take pleasure in. Finally – personalism, people are put in first place; morality is personal and never centred in laws, this emphasises the concept morality can be relative to scenarios. Fletcher put forward 6 offrande which as well aid the idea. The initial proposition can be “only a very important factor is intrinsically good; namely love; nothing else at all” Thus, only love excellent in itself; action aren’t intrinsically good or evil. Instead they are very good or bad dependent on whether or not they promote the most loving result. Fletcher rejects any statements like “Adultery is wrong” as conditions are always different, and sometimes it can be right for coitus to take place. The second proposition is definitely “the judgment norm of Christian decision is like, nothing else” Fletcher statements Jesus substituted the Torah with appreciate, also the Ten Tips are not absolute even Jesus broke all of them when appreciate demanded this. Love eliminates law. The next proposition is that justice follows from take pleasure in, because ‘justice is take pleasure in distributed’. In the event love is usually put into practice it might only lead to justice. Next is that appreciate has no likes and does not provide whom we all like helpful treatment. “Love wills the neighbour’s if we like him or not” The fifth primary principle, like must be the last end, not really a means to an end. For Fletcher, the end has to be the most caring result. Finally the 6th proposition is that the most loving thing to do will depend on the situation and since situations differ, you can’t say an action will be correct in every scenario. Fletcher, the great result is the fact which provides agape appreciate best. Virtually any action leading to that end is correct.

Related Essays