Why Am I an Atheist Essay

Why Am I an Atheist Essay

It is a couple of debate if my lack of belief inside the existence of the Omnipresent, Omniscient God is because of my arrogant pride and vanity. It never occurred to me that sometime in the future I might be involved in polemics of this kind. Because of some discussions with my friends, (if my own claim to a friendly relationship is certainly not uncalled for) I have realized that after having known me for a short amount of time only, a lot of them have reached a sort of hasty conclusion about me personally that my atheism is usually my foolishness and that it is the outcome of my pride. Even it is a serious problem. I do not really boast of staying above these types of human follies. I i am, after all, a human being and nothing even more. And no you can claim to become more than that. I have a weak spot in my individuality, for pride is one of the human being traits that we do possess. I i am known as a dictator among my friends. Sometimes I am called a boaster. A lot of have always been worrying that I was bossy and i also force others to accept my opinion. Yes, it is true to some extent. I do not really deny this charge. We can use the word ‘vainglory’ because of it. As far as the contemptible, outdated, rotten beliefs of our world are concerned, I am a long sceptic. Yet this problem does not matter my person alone. It can be being proud of my ideas, my thoughts. It can not be called clear pride. Pride, or you could use the word, vanity, both indicate an exaggerated assessment of one’s character. Is my own atheism due to unnecessary pleasure, or have I actually ceased trusting in Our god after thinking long and deep for the matter? I would like to put my own ideas before you. To begin with, let us separate between take great pride in and pride as these are two different things. I have never been able to know how unproven, baseless pleasure or bare vanity may hinder a person by believing in God. I might refuse to admit the greatness of a fantastic person only when I have acquired fame without doing any kind of serious efforts or while i lack the superior mental powers required to become superb. It is easy to appreciate but how is it possible a believer can make into a non-believer because of his vanity? Just two things will be possible: either a man believes himself to be in possession of Godly qualities, or perhaps he will go a step further more and states himself to be a god. In both these states of mind he may not be an atheist in the accurate sense with the word. Inside the first case, it is not an outright rejection of God’s existence; inside the other, he's affirming the existence of some kind of great power responsible for the working of universe. It does not harm each of our argument if he claims to become a god or perhaps considers The almighty to be a actuality in existence previously mentioned his individual being. The real point, nevertheless , is that in both situations he is a theist, a believer. He is not an atheist. I want to bring home this point for you. I was not one of the two creeds. I totally reject the presence of an Ubiquitous, all powerful, almost all knowing The almighty. Why so? Let me discuss it later inside the essay. Right here I wish to emphasise that I am not an atheist for the reason that I am conceited or proud or vain; nor am I a demi-god, nor a prophet; not any, nor am i not God myself. At least one thing applies that I have not evolved this thought as a result of vanity or pride. In order to answer this question We relate the fact. My friends declare after Delhi bombing and Lahore Conspiracy Case, We rocketed to fame and that this truth has flipped my head. Let us discuss why this allegation is definitely incorrect. I did not give up my own belief in God following these incidents. I was an atheist even if I was an unknown figure. At least a school student are unable to cherish any kind of exaggerated idea of himself that may business lead him to atheism. It truly is true that I was a favorite with some college teachers, nevertheless others would not like me. I had been never a hardworking or studious young man. I hardly ever got a chance to be very pleased. I was very careful in my behavior and to some degree pessimistic regarding my upcoming career. I had been not entirely atheistic in my beliefs. I had been brought up beneath the care and protection of my father. Having been a staunch Arya Samaji. An Arya Samaji could be anything but hardly ever an atheist. After my own elementary education, I was sent to D. A. V College, Lahore. We lived in the boarding house for one season. Besides prayers early in the morning and at dusk time, We sat for hours and chanted religious Mantras. At that time, I had been a staunch believer. I quickly lived with my father. He was a understanding man in his religious sights. It is as a result of his theories that I dedicated my life to get the cause of delivering my nation. But he was not an atheist. His The almighty was a great all-pervading Organization. He recommended me to offer my prayers every day. This way I was raised. In the noncooperation days, I got admission for the National College. During my be in this college, I started out thinking over-all the faith based polemics in a way that I grew sceptical regarding the existence of Our god. In spite of this fact I will say that my own belief in God was firm and strong. My spouse and i grew a beard and ‘Kais’ (long head of hair being a Sikh religious custom). Despite this I possibly could not influence myself from the efficacy of Sikh religious beliefs or any religious beliefs at all, for example. But I had formed an dependable, unwavering perception in Our god. Then I joined up with the Revolutionary Party. The initially leader I actually met had not the valor to honestly declare himself an atheist. He was struggling to reach virtually any conclusion with this point. Whenever I asked him about the presence of God, this individual gave me this reply: “You may trust in him at the time you feel like it. ” The second innovator with to whom I came in contact was obviously a firm who trust. I should mention his name. It absolutely was our respectable Comrade Sachindara Nath Sanyal. He was sentenced to life imprisonment in connection with Karachi conspiracy case. Right from the first page of his only book, ‘Bandi Jivan’ (Incarnated Life) he performs praises towards the Glory of God. View the last webpage of the second part of this book and you locate praises showered upon Goodness in the way of a mystic. It is just a clear expression of his thoughts. In line with the prosecution, the ‘Revolutionary Leaflet’ which was given away throughout India was the result of Sachindara Nath Sanyal’s intellectual time. So often it happens that in revolutionary actions a leader conveys his personal ideas that could be very dear to him, but in revenge of having variations, the additional workers have to acquiesce in them. For the reason that leaflet, one full section was dedicated to the good remarks of God and His doings which we all, human beings, are not able to understand. This is sheer mysticism. What I desire to point out is that the idea of question the existence of Our god did not even occur to the brand new Party. The popular Kakory martyrs, all four of which, passed all their last day in praying. Ram Parshad Bismal was a staunch Arya Samaji. Regardless of his huge studies in Socialism and Communism, Rajan Lahiri cannot suppress his desire to recite hymns coming from Upanishads and Gita. There is but merely one person most notable who did not indulge in such activities. He used to say, “Religion is the result of human being weakness and also the limitation of human expertise. ” He could be also in prison forever. But this individual also hardly ever dared to deny the existence of God. Right up until that time I used to be only a romantic revolutionary, simply a follower of our leaders. In that case came you a chance to shoulder the full responsibility. For some time, a strong resistance put the extremely existence with the party in danger. A large number of leaders along with many excited comrades began to uphold the party to poker fun at. They jeered at us. I had fashioned an apprehension that some day I will contemplate it an ineffective and unattainable task. It had been a turning point in my groundbreaking career. A great incessant aspire to study stuffed my center. ‘Study the more’, explained I to myself in order that I might manage to face the arguments of my oppositions. ‘Study’ to back up your point of view with persuasive arguments. And i also began to study in a significant manner. My personal previous beliefs and verite underwent a radical change. The romantic endeavors of militancy dominated our predecessors; at this point serious suggestions ousted this way of pondering. No more mysticism! No more blind faith! At this point realism was our method of considering. At times of terrible necessity, we can use extreme strategies, but physical violence produces reverse results in mass movements. I have talked much about each of our methods. The main thing was obviously a clear conception of our ideology for which i was waging an extended struggle. Since there was not any election activity going on, I acquired ample possibility to study numerous ideas propounded by several writers. We studied Bakunin, the radical leader. My spouse and i read some books of Marx, the daddy of The reds. I as well read Lenin and Trotsky and many other authors who efficiently carried out cycles in their countries. All of them had been atheists. The ideas found in Bakunin’s ‘God and State’ seem not yet proven, but it is an interesting publication. After that I came across a book ‘Common Sense’ by Nirlamba Swami. His point of view was a type of mystical atheism. I created more involvement in this subject matter. By the end of 1926, I had been convinced the fact that belief within an Almighty, Supreme Being who have created, guided and managed the whole world had simply no sound fundamentals. I commenced discussions with this subject with my friends. I had developed openly announced myself a great atheist. What meant will be discussed inside the following lines. In May 1927, I was imprisoned in Lahore. This criminal arrest came like a big surprise for me. I had formed not the least idea that I used to be wanted by the police. I had been passing through a garden and all of a sudden the police surrounded myself. To my surprise, I was very quiet at that time. I had been in full power over myself. I had been taken in to police custody of the children. The next day I had been taken to the Railway Law enforcement lockup in which I spent a whole month. After a large number of days’ conversation with authorities personnel, We guessed that they can had a lot of information about my personal connection with the Kakori Get together. I experienced they had a lot of intelligence of my alternative activities in the revolutionary movement. That they told me that we was in Lucknow during the Kakori Party Trial so that I would devise a scheme to rescue the culprits. Additionally they said that following the plan have been approved, we procured several bombs and by way of test out, one of those bombs was chucked into a audience on the event of Dussehra in 1926. They agreed to release me on state that I gave a statement for the activities of the Revolutionary Get together. In this way I might be set free and rewarded and i also would not become produced as an approver in the court. I could not really help laughing at all their proposals. It was all humbug. People who have suggestions like ours do not toss bombs for their own blameless people. One day, Mr. Newman, the in that case senior Superintendent of FIN, came to myself. After a long talk that has been full of sympathetic words, he imparted in my experience what he considered to be miserable news, that if I did not give any kind of statement while demanded by them, they might be forced to send me up for trial for conspiracy to wage-war in connection with Kakori Case and also for intense killings in Dussehra gathering. After that he said that he previously sufficient proof to obtain me found guilty and hanged. I was totally innocent, nevertheless I thought that the police had sufficient power to do it if they will desired it to be therefore. The same day time some police officers persuaded me to offer my own prayers to God 2 times regularly. I was an atheist. I thought i would settle that to myself whether I could brag just in times of peace and happiness that we was an atheist, or in these hard times I can be working in my verite. After a very long debate with myself, My spouse and i reached the conclusion that I could not even pretend that to be a believer nor is there a chance i offer my own prayers to God. Simply no, I did not it. It was time of trial and I might come out of that successful. They were my thoughts. Never to get a moment do I wish to save my entire life. So I was a true atheist then and i also am a great atheist now. It was rather than an easy activity to face that ordeal. Values make it easier to proceed through hardships, also make them pleasurable. Man will find a strong help in God and an motivating consolation in the Name. For those who have no perception in Him, then there is no alternative but for depend upon yourself. It is not child’s play to stand firm with your feet among storms and strong winds. In challenging times, vanity, if it remains to be, evaporates and man simply cannot find the courage to defy values held in common esteem by the people. If he actually revolts against such morals, we must deduce that it is certainly not sheer counter; he has its own kind of extraordinary strength. This really is the situation right now. First of all we all know what the reasoning will be. It is to be pronounced in a week. I am going to sacrifice my life to get a cause. What more consolation will there be! A God-believing Hindu may well expect to become reborn a king; a Muslim or a Christian might imagine the luxuries he hopes to enjoy in paradise being a reward for his sufferings and sacrifices. What hope should I entertain? I know that will be the end when the rope can be tightened round my neck of the guitar and the rafters move from under my personal feet. To work with more exact religious terms, that will be the moment of ful annihilation. My personal soul can come to nothing at all. If I take those courage to take the matter in the light of ‘Reward’, I see that a short life of struggle with no such impressive end shall itself end up being my ‘Reward. ’ That is certainly all. With no selfish motive of getting any reward right here or in the hereafter, quite disinterestedly have I focused my life towards the cause of liberty. I could certainly not act normally. The day shall usher within a new era of liberty when a many men and women, taking courage in the idea of offering humanity and liberating them from sufferings and problems, decide that there is no alternative before them apart from devoting their very own lives just for this cause. They will wage a war against their oppressors, tyrants or exploiters, to not become kings, or to gain any praise here or perhaps in the next delivery or after loss of life in haven; but to players off the yoke of captivity, to establish freedom and peacefulness they will stand this perilous, but glorious path. Can the pride they get in their noble cause end up being called pride? Who is generally there rash enough to call it up so? To him My answer is either he is foolish or perhaps wicked. Leave such a fellow only for he cannot understand the depth, the emotions, the belief and the rspectable feelings that surge for the reason that heart. His heart is definitely dead, merely a lump of flesh, with no feelings. His convictions are infirm, his emotions weak. His selfish interests have made him incapable of seeing the truth. The device ‘vanity’ is always hurled with the strength we have from our croyance. You go against popular feelings; you criticise a leading man, a great man who is generally believed to be over criticism. What are the results? No one can answer the arguments within a rational method; rather you'll certainly be considered vainglorious. Its cause is mental insipidity. Severe criticism and independent pondering are the two necessary qualities of revolutionary thinking. As Mahatmaji is fantastic, he is previously mentioned criticism; when he has gone up above, all that he says in neuro-scientific politics, faith, Ethics is right. You acknowledge or not, it is holding upon you to take that as fact. This is not constructive thinking. We do not take a leap forward; we get many actions back. Each of our forefathers advanced faith in certain kind of Great Being, consequently , one who undertakings to obstacle the validity of that hope or refuses the existence of Goodness, shall be called a Kafir (infidel), or a renegade. Even if his arguments are extremely strong it is impossible to refute them, if his spirit is indeed strong that he can not be bowed straight down by the dangers of misfortune that may hit him throughout the wrath with the Almighty, he shall be decried as vainglorious. Then why exactly should we spend our time in such discussion posts? This problem has come prior to the people the first time, hence the necessity and usefulness of these kinds of long discussions. As far as the first question is concerned, I think I have managed to get clear which i did not switch atheist due to vanity. Simply my visitors, not My spouse and i, can make a decision whether my personal arguments carry weight. Merely were a believer, I understand in the present instances my life might have been easier; the duty lighter. My own disbelief in God offers turned all the circumstances also harsh and this situation can deteriorate even more. Being a very little mystical will give the circumstances a poetic convert. But We would like no opiate to meet my end. I am a realistic man. I have to overpower this kind of tendency in me by making use of Reason. I actually am not at all times successful in such efforts. But it is usually man’s duty to try and help to make efforts. Achievement depends on probability and circumstances. Now we come to the second query: if it is certainly not vanity, there ought to be several sound reason for rejection of age-old belief in Goodness. Yes, We come for this question. I think that virtually any man who has some reasoning power constantly tries to be familiar with life and people around him with the help of this kind of faculty. Where concrete proofs are lacking, [mystical] philosophy creeps in. ?nternet site have indicated, one of my own revolutionary friends used to say that “philosophy is the outcome of human weakness. ” The ancestors had the enjoyment to solve the mysteries worldwide, its previous, its present and its long term, its whys and its wherefores, but he was terribly in short supply of direct proofs, every one of these people tried to solve the problem in the own approach. Hence we find wide differences in the fundamentals of varied religious creeds. Sometimes they take very antagonistic and conflicting forms. We find differences in Asian and Occidental philosophies. You will find differences possibly amongst several schools of thoughts in each hemisphere. In Hard anodized cookware religions, the Muslim religion is completely incompatible with the Hindu faith. In India alone, Buddhism and Jainism are occasionally quite individual from Brahmanism. Then in Brahmanism alone, we find two conflicting sects: Aarya Samaj and Snatan Dheram. Charwak is yet another 3rd party thinker of the past age groups. He challenged the Power of Goodness. All these faiths differ upon many primary questions, yet each of them statements to be the only true faith. This is the reason behind the wicked. Instead of expanding the suggestions and tests of historical thinkers, therefore providing ourselves with the ideological weapon for future years struggle, – lethargic, nonproductive, fanatical as we are – we cling to orthodox religion and in in this way reduce human awakening into a stagnant pool. It is necessary for everyone who stands for progress to criticise just about every tenet of old values. Item simply by item he has to concern the efficiency of older faith. This individual has to review and figure out all the details. In the event after rigorous reasoning, is led to trust in any theory of viewpoint, his trust is valued. His thinking may be wrongly diagnosed and even fallacious. But there exists chance that he will become corrected because Reason may be the guiding principle of his life. But idea, I should claim blind belief is disastrous. It deprives a man of his understanding power besides making him reactionary. Any person whom claims to become a realist needs to challenge the fact of older beliefs. If faith simply cannot withstand the onslaught of reason, this collapses. After that his task should be to the actual groundwork for brand spanking new philosophy. This is actually the negative side. Next comes in the positive work in which in turn some material of the olden times may be used to construct the pillars of new philosophy. In my view, I declare that I shortage sufficient study in this discipline. I had a great desire to research the Oriental Philosophy, although I could acquire ample prospect or satisfactory time to do so. But in terms of I decline the old time beliefs, it is not a matter of countering belief with opinion, rather I will challenge the efficacy of old philosophy with audio arguments. We feel in characteristics and that individual progress depends on the domination of man more than nature. There is no conscious power behind it. This is our idea. Being atheist, I ask a few questions from theists: 1 . In the event that, as you believe that there is a great Almighty, Ubiquitous, Omniscient Our god, who came up with the earth or universe, make sure you let me know, first of all, as to why he created our planet. This world which contains significant amount of woe and grief, and countless miseries, where not even one person comes from peace. 2 . Pray, don’t say it is His regulation. If He is bound simply by any regulation, He is certainly not Omnipotent. Don’t say it really is His satisfaction. Nero burnt off one Rome. He wiped out a very limited number of people. He caused just a few tragedies, all for his morbid enjoyment. But what is his put in place history? In what names do we remember him? All the abusive epithets happen to be hurled by him. Internet pages are blackened with attaque diatribes condemning Nero: the tyrant, the heartless, the wicked. One Genghis Khan killed a few thousand individuals to seek delight in this and we hate the very identity. Now, how could you justify your all powerful, eternal Nero, who also every day, every single moment proceeds his pastime of eliminating people? How may you support his doings which usually surpass those of Genghis Khan in rudeness and in misery inflicted after people? My spouse and i ask why the Immutable created this world which is simply a living heck, a place of constant and bitter unrest. Why performed he generate man when he had the ability not to do and so? Have you any answer to these questions? You will say that you should reward the sufferer and punish the evildoer in the hereafter. Well, well, what lengths will you rationalize a man who first of all inflicts injuries with your body and then applies very soft and calming ointment on them? How far the supporters and organizers of Gladiator rounds were validated in throwing men just before half deprived lions, afterwards to be cared for and looked after well if they steered clear of this horrible death. For this reason I question: Was the creation of guy intended to get this kind of pleasure? Open your eyes and see huge numbers of people dying of hunger in slums and huts unsanitary than the grim dungeons of prisons; merely see the labourers patiently or say apathetically while the abundant vampires suck their blood; bring to mind the wastage of human energy that will make a man with a little practical shiver in horror. Merely observe abundant nations tossing their surplus produce in to the sea rather than distributing it among the needy and starving. There are palaces of nobleman built upon the footings laid with human bone fragments. Let them find all this and say “All is well in God’s Kingdom. ” Why are so? This is my personal question. You are noiseless. All right. My spouse and i proceed to my personal next stage. You, the Hindus, could say: Whosoever undergoes sufferings in this life, must have recently been a sinner in his previous birth. It can be tantamount to saying that those who are oppressors at this point were Godly people in that case, in their past births. Because of this alone they will hold electrical power in their hands. Let me declare it plainly that the ancestors had been shrewd persons. They were always in search of petty hoaxes to play after people and snatch from them the power of Purpose. Let us evaluate how much this kind of argument holds weight! Those who find themselves well versed inside the philosophy of Jurisprudence associate three of four justifications pertaining to the treatment that is to be inflicted after a wrong-doer. These are: revenge, reform, and deterrence. The Retribution Theory is now condemned by each of the thinkers. Prevention theory is definitely on the anvil for its imperfections. Reformative theory is now broadly accepted and considered to be essential for human progress. It is aimed at reforming the culprit and switching him right into a peace-loving citizen. But what in essence is God’s Punishment regardless if it is caused on a person that has really done some harm? For the sake of argument we concur for a instant that a person committed several crime in his previous beginning and The almighty punished him by changing his condition into a cow, cat, tree, or any various other animal. You might enumerate the amount of these variations in Godly Punishment being at least eighty-four shortage. Tell me, features this tomfoolery, perpetrated with the intention of punishment, any reformative effect on human man? How quite a few have you met who were donkeys in their earlier births for having committed virtually any sin? Absolutely no one of this kind! The socalled theory of ‘Puranas’ (transmigration) is nothing but a fairy-tale. I do not have any intention to bring this unutterable trash below discussion. You don't know the most cursed trouble in this world will be poor? Yes, poverty can be described as sin; it is a punishment! Cursed be the theoretician, jurist or legislator who proposes such actions as press man into the quagmire of more atrocious sins. Achieved it not occur to your All Being aware of God or he may learn the real truth only after millions acquired undergone untold sufferings and hardships? What, according on your theory, is definitely the fate of a person who, by simply no sin of his own, has been born into a family of low caste people? He is poor so he cannot visit a school. It truly is his fate to be shunned and resented by individuals who are born into a high famille. His lack of knowledge, his lower income, and the contempt he obtains from others will solidify his heart towards world. Supposing that he commits a trouble, who shall bear the outcomes? God, or he, or the learned persons of that world? What is your view about these punishments inflicted on the people that were deliberately kept uninformed by self-centered and happy Brahmans? If perhaps by probability these poor creatures observed a few words of your holy books, Vedas, these Brahmans poured dissolved lead to their ears. In the event they committed any trouble, who was to become held responsible? Who was to bear the brunt? My own dear close friends, these theories have been coined by the happy classes. That they try to rationalize the power they may have usurped and the riches they have robbed with the aid of such theories. Perhaps it absolutely was the copy writer Upton Sinclair who had written (Bhagat Singh is discussing Sinclair’s pamphlet ‘Profits of Religion’ – MIA transcriber) somewhere “only make a male firm believer in the immortality of heart and soul, then deceive him of most that he possesses. He can willingly assist you in the process. ” The dirty alliance among religious preachers and possessors of electric power brought the boon of prisons, gallows, knouts and above all this kind of theories pertaining to the mankind. I inquire why the Omnipotent Our god does not hold a man when he is going to commit a sin or perhaps offence. It is child’s enjoy for God. Why performed He not really kill war lords? Why did He not obliterate the bear of warfare from their thoughts? In this way This individual could have saved humanity of countless a great calamity and scary. Why does This individual not include humanistic sentiments into the heads of the Britishers so that they may willingly leave India? I actually ask for what reason He will not fill the hearts of all capitalist classes with altruistic humanism that prompts those to give up personal possession of the means of production and this will free the whole labouring humankind from the leaf spring shackles of money. You want to argue the practicability of Socialist theory, I leave it to your Immutable God to enforce this. Common people understand the merits of Socialist theory as far as standard welfare is involved but they are at odds of it within the pretext that it cannot be implemented. Let the Luminous step in and arrange items in a right way. No longer logic cutting! I let you know that the English rule is definitely not right now there because The almighty willed it but for the key reason why that we lack the will and courage to oppose this. Not they are keeping all of us under subjugation with the permission of Goodness, but it is with the pressure of guns and weapons, bombs and bullets, law enforcement and militia, and most importantly because of the apathy they are successfully committing the most deplorable sin, that is certainly, the fermage of one region by one more. Where can be God? Precisely what is He carrying out? Is This individual getting a unhealthy pleasure from it? A Nero! A Genghis Khan! Down with Him! Now an additional piece of created logic! Anyone asks me could will explain the origin of this world and origin of man. Charles Darwin has tried to throw some light on this subject. Study his book. Likewise, have a look at Sohan Swami’s “Commonsense. ” You'll a satisfactory response. This topic is concerned with Biology and Natural Record. This is a phenomenon of nature. The accidental combination of different chemicals in the form of Nebulae gave beginning to this the planet. When? Research history to be aware of this. A similar process caused the evolution of animals and in the future that of guy. Read Darwin’s ‘Origin of Species. ’ All the later on progress is a result of man’s frequent conflict with nature fantastic efforts to utilise nature for his own advantage. This is the briefest sketch on this phenomenon. Your next question will be why a child comes into the world blind or lame regardless if he was not only a sinner in his previous beginning. This problem have been explained in a satisfactory manner by biologists as a pure biological happening. According to them the full burden rests upon the shoulders of parents whose conscious or unconscious deeds brought on mutilation from the child just before his birth. You may drive yet another issue at me personally, though it really is merely idiotic. The question is: If God will not really can be found, why carry out people come to believe in Him? Simple and concise my response will be. As they come to believe in spirits, and wicked spirits, and so they also progress a kind of perception in Our god: the only difference being that Our god is almost a universal phenomenon and well toned theological idea. However , I actually do disagree with radical philosophy. It attributes His origins to the genius of exploiters who wanted to keep the people under all their subjugation by preaching the presence of a Supreme Being; thus claimed an authority and sanction from charlie for their happy position. I actually do not vary on the essential point that religions, faiths, theological sagesse, and spiritual creeds and everything other such institutions in the long run turn into supporters in the tyrannical and exploiting organizations, men and classes. Rebellion against virtually any king has always been a bad thing in every religious beliefs. As respect the origin of God, my own thought is that man created God in the imagination when he realized his weaknesses, limitations and weak points. In this way he got the courage to handle all the striving circumstances and meet every dangers which may occur in his life and also to restrain his outbursts in prosperity and affluence. The almighty, with his fancyful laws and parental generosity was coated with variegated colours of imagination. He was used as a deterrent factor when his fury great laws were repeatedly spread so that man might not get a danger to society. Having been the cry of the distressed soul intended for he was thought to stand because father and mother, sister and buddy, brother and friend once in time of distress a person was still left alone and helpless. He was Almighty and could do anything. Thinking about God is helpful to a gentleman in distress. Society must fight from this belief in God as it fought against ideal worship and also other narrow ideas of religion. This way man will endeavour to stand on his feet. Being practical, he will have to throw his faith aside and deal with all adversaries with bravery and valour. That is precisely my frame of mind. My friends, it is not necessarily my vanity; it is my own mode of thinking that has turned me an atheist. We don’t think that by fortifying my idea in God and by supplying prayers to Him each day, (this I actually consider to be the most degraded act on the part of man) I could bring improvement in my circumstance, nor may i further damage it. I have read of many atheists facing all problems boldly, so I am planning to stand just like a man with the head high and erect to the last; even for the gallows. I want to see how working I was. One of my local freinds asked me to pray. The moment informed of my atheism, he explained, “When your last days and nights come, you will begin to believe. ” I stated, “No, special sir, By no means shall it happen. My spouse and i consider it to become an take action of wreckage and demoralisation. For this sort of petty self-centered motives, We shall by no means pray. ” Reader and friends, would it be vanity? Whether it is, I indicate it.

Related Essays