Engaging Strategy Essay

Engaging Strategy Essay

Intro This paper will concentrate on constructing a strategy to engage and build rapport using a particular consumer on the provided vignette. The job is to travel through obstacles that may arise which can be unique to his characteristics including insufficient information and limited study. To get over these obstacles of building rapport, the specialist must identify the client’s strengths and struggles along with research scholarly literature on the client’s characteristics that are considerably different than the clinician’s to interact with and benefit the client’s treatment. Major Road blocks The major obstacles engaging with this particular client may be the apparent lack of research in approaching a gay client with ethnic competency, specifically individuals who are intersected with other community groups, in this instance being Legislation as well as a mature adult. According to Eubank-Carter, Curckell, and Goldfried (2005), as of the year 2003, only 54% of LGB-related articles have already been based on scientific research as well as less study addressing LGB people of color for a mere 12%. The lack of exploration on the client’s identity like a gay male poses as an barrier as the clinician is a straight female, forming a barrier in to building relationship on the basis of exhibiting empathy and being relatable. According to Hepworth, Rooney, Rooney, Strom-Gottfried, and Larsen (2013), building rapport which has a client allows clients to achieve trust in the helpful objective and goodwill of the social worker…” and further emphasizes, “cultural factors and language differences compound potential barriers to relationship even further (pg. 47). The multiple cultural differences between clinician and client provides for a barrier to building relationship as well as connecting the client with connection to solutions to fulfill his request. Increasing the lack of study on the client’s sexual alignment, he as well identifies as being a Jewish American, which may be a sensitive subject in building rapport, since it is unknown in the event he determines ethnically, carefully, both or non-e. According to Faulkner &Hecht (2010), for Jewish-American LGBTQ individuals, a significant concern that has been determined relates to the disclosure of their intersectional id being a “twin threats of negative thinking toward LGBTQ individuals and anti-Semitism” by which negative stigma towards LGBTQ identity was reinforced in Judaism, giving those identifying as homosexual to cover up their sexual orientation and emphasizing their very own Jewish identity to avoid hazards (Introduction section, pg. 830). This postures the sensitive question of exactly where the client contains a support system, as upon first impression, it can appear blurred. Finally regarding the supervisor’s area of issue the client being in an Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) relationship together with his partner, deficiency of research about same-sex couples, specifically guys, issues that could become an hurdle include the clinician subconsciously looking at the issue through a heterocentric contact lens. Not only is definitely research inadequate on LGBTQ in general, especially with IPV, there is certainly lack of training on how to way cliental for clinicians who were brought up in a heterocentric bulk society. This is simply not surprising because out of a study of 108 medical and therapies graduate students, the majority stated they believed unprepared to work with LGBTQ clientele (Eubank-Carter ain al june 2006, pg. 2) (check citation). Although assets are available for LGBTQ clients being self sufficient, because of these issues mentioned above, they are limited. Countertransference With this consumer, I battled with countertransference in terms of earlier experience and projective identity. This is not my first encounter with an older, gay consumer applying for low-income housing plus the past consumer sadly encountered discrimination by simply those operating and surviving in the facilities. I i am also informed although twenty two states possess passed regulations prohibiting discrimination against sexual orientation in private or public housing, people who hold power in these areas can reject services to LGBTQ customers without legal reasoning (Hillman 2014, pg. 272). The past client experienced this situation and this knowledge can affect my personal ability to not give a temperament that Paul will instantly face the same result, hence affecting my personal ability to create a proper romance as specialist and customer. Although this is a secondary matter to suspicion of IPV that usually takes priority, it can be still relevant as it might be revisited after, thus creating another hurdle to building rapport. Educational Literature Eubanks-Carter, Burckell & Goldfried’s article (2005) worked well as a standard guidebook to get the specialist. It highlighted, “Our LGB clients are gay, saphic girls and androgino men and women; they are really members of families, occupations, and residential areas. Our objective is to agree not only their sexual positioning, but their complete identity” (Eubanks-Carter et 's, 2005, pg. 9). This was a reminder to master to be broadly competent on the client for more than just his sexual alignment, but as an entire with his various other intersectional details. Hillmans’ content (2014) protected the perspective of working with the customer through the contact lens that he's gay and an older adult in his 70s. One important concept can be point out that he was raised in an period where homosexuality in American was extremely discriminated. Relating to Hillman (2014), the 1950s had been a time when President Eisenhower issued 1953’s Executive Buy #10450 buying “homosexuals being fired by government jobs” and McCarthy in 1954 included homosexuals in the selection of “subversive elements”, (Historical and Cohort Effects, pg. 270). The client might still have adverse feelings with regards to homophobia from your past, thus it is essential for the clinician to keep vigilant of her frame of mind and countertransference. Seelau & Seelau’s content (2005) offered insight as to the reasons the client, in the event that involved in an IPV relationship, probably reluctant to report. In accordance to research, “police are reportedly less likely to intervene in domestic violence cases that involve gay or lesbian couples, probably due to sex prejudice (i. e., homophobia) or gender role-stereotypes that girls cannot be abusers and men cannot be mistreated (Seelau ou al, 2006, pg. 364). It is important for the clinician to keep be aware of this simple fact as the customer may have distrust pertaining to law enforcement, therefore keeping the abuse a top secret.

Related Essays