American Needle vs. The National Soccer League Properties Essay

American Needle vs. The National Soccer League Properties Essay

The organization allowed a specific quantity of nonexclusive licenses to a number of licensees. American Needle was among the licensees. They made a number of headwear that displayed the many NFL group logos. The licensing contract lasted until 2000. The NFL groups sanctioned the NFLP to provide Reebok an exclusive permit for headwear. With this decision, the NFLP didn't renew American Needle's permit or the licenses of any additional headwear vendors.
American Needle Inc. filed a match within an Illinois district courtroom against the NFL, NFLP, NFL groups, and Reebok, claiming that exclusive license contract violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 Р’В§ U.S.C. 1, which outlaws any "contract, mixture . . . or conspiracy, in restraint of trade." American Needle argued that because specific groups separately own their group logos and trademarks, their collective contract to authorize NFLP to award the unique headwear permit to Reebok, was a conspiracy to restrict other vendors' capability to get licenses for the groups' intellectual property.
The respondents, NFL, transferred for a movement of summary judgment on the Section 1 state, arguing it had been immune from antitrust liability as an individual entity. In response, American Needle sought a continuance and asked the U.S. District Court to permit discovery, a movement opposed by the

Related Essays